The American Civil Liberties Union and First Liberty Institute filed the suit challenged the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority’s advertising restrictions as violations of the First Amendment.
The lawsuit was filed on behalf of WallBuilder Presentations, an organization advocating for Americans to understand their history and the important role religion played in the founding of our nation.
The group wanted to put ads on transit authority busses showing George Washington praying during the Revolutionary War.
The Transit authority rejected the ads on the grounds that they violated its advertising guidelines, which prohibit advertising “intended to influence members of the public regarding an issue on which there are varying public opinions.” The policy also prohibits advertisements “that promote or oppose any religion, religious practice or belief.”
The lawsuit argues that these ad guidelines aren’t applied consistently. It provides many examples of ads about controversial issues that the transit authority has accepted, such as recent ads demanding Supreme Court term limits along with ads demanding transparency in hospital prices.
WMATA has also accepted ads with religious content, such as an ad for The Book of Mormon musical, which harshly lampoons the Mormon Church and religion in general. The lawsuit shows how the guidelines inevitably lead to discrimination based on advertisers’ viewpoints and are necessarily applied in an arbitrary and unreasonable manner.
“The case against WMATA is a critical reminder of what’s at stake when government entities exercise selective censorship. The First Amendment doesn’t play favorites; it ensures that all voices, regardless of their message, have the right to be heard,” said Arthur Spitzer, Senior Counsel at the ACLU-D.C. “ACLU defends these suits, regardless of whether it agrees with the underlying message because it believes in the speaker’s right to express it. The government cannot arbitrarily decide which voices to silence in public forums.”
“The First Amendment grants all Americans the right to express their point of view, religious or secular,” said First Liberty Senior Counsel Jeremy Dys. “Rejecting a faith-based advertising banner by labeling it an ‘issue ad,’ while accepting other ads such as those promoting a ‘Social Justice School,’ ‘Earth Day,’ and the highly controversial idea of terms limits for Supreme Court Justices, is clearly hypocritical, discriminatory, and illegal. WMATA must support the freedoms provided in the First Amendment rather than silence Americans through censorship.”
The lawsuit asks the court to declare the WMATA guidelines prohibiting “issue ads” and ads with religious content unconstitutional and to order WMATA to accept and run the WallBuilders advertisements it had rejected and others that would violate these guidelines.
The complaint in today’s case, WallBuilders v. WMATA, may be found here.